Evidence-based nutrition - review of nutritional epidemiological studies
Abstract
Results from epidemiological studies are often used to explore the relationships between nutrition and health. The objective of this paper is to provide guidelines for evaluating the quality and strength of evidence from different types of epidemiological studies (including ecological, cross-sectional, case-control, cohort and experimental studies) for conclusions about the relationship between nutrition and health. The discussion include advantages and disadvantages of these different types of studies, exposures, outcomes, the role of chance, bias and confounding factors, recruitment and sampling procedures and criteria, study size and power, measurement error (random and systematic), time effects, observer and participant effects, compliance, as well as analysis and interpretation of results. A checklist for reviewing epidemiological studies is given as guide to assess the quality of the data and the suitability of the study results for specific conclusions.
How to Cite
Margetts, B., Vorster, H., & Venter, C. (1). Evidence-based nutrition - review of nutritional epidemiological studies. South African Journal of Clinical Nutrition. Retrieved from http://sajcn.redbricklibrary.com/index.php/SAJCN/article/view/23
Issue
Section
Original Research
Material submitted for publication in the South African Journal of Clinical Nutrition (SAJCN) is accepted provided it has not been published elsewhere. Copyright forms will be sent with acknowledgement of receipt and the SAJCN reserves copyright of the material published.
The SAJCN does not hold itself responsible for statements made by the authors.